EU schrapt subsidie Nabucco-pijpleiding

De Nabucco-pijpleiding is vooralsnog geschrapt van een EU-projectenlijst voor grote Europese subsidies. De beoogde financiering voor de gaspijp werd eerder al verlaagd van 250 tot 200 miljoen euro.
De aanleg van de Nabucco-pijpleiding via Turkije naar de EU i stuit op tegenstand van bijna de helft van de lidstaten, zo bleek dinsdag. Vooral Oost-Europese landen willen zo geld vrijmaken voor energieprojecten binnen hun eigen grenzen. Voornaamste tegenstander Duitsland heeft bezwaar tegen de publieke financiering voor private projecten. Het land zou liever zien dat de controversiële pijplijn tussen Rusland en Duitsland, de 'North Stream' op de lijst met gefinancierde projecten komt.
De aanleg van de Nabucco, die wordt gecoördineerd door de Haagse burgemeester Jozias van Aartsen i, beoogt de EU minder afhankelijk te maken van Russische gasleveranties door import vanuit de Kaspische regio. Azerbeidzjan wordt als grootste leverancier gezien. De pijplijn zou in 2014 in gebruik moeten worden genomen.
Het project stuit op problemen door de aarzeling bij de private geldschieters en door de oorlog tussen Rusland en Georgië in augustus 2008. Een obstakel is ook de concurrerende South Stream, die wordt gesteund door het Russische Gazprom. Verscheidene lidstaten van de EU hebben al getekend voor de South Stream, wat hun belang en betrokkenheid bij Nabucco in twijfel trekt.
De Europese Commissie i verklaarde dat de Nabucco pijplijn nog steeds gefinancierd kan worden onder het aangepaste plan. ,,Het feit dat we de naam hebben veranderd, betekent niet dat het hele project van de baan is'', zei de woordvoerder van de commissie.

Source: Europa NU

Rusland noodzakelijk om Nabucco te laten functioneren?

At last week’s Nabucco summit, the European Union took decisive steps by pledging the firmest possible political support for the project, in order to disperse any doubts that its intention to build a pipeline whose sole purpose is to supply Europe with non-Russian gas is indeed real. This week, the story took an unexpected turn. The Director of the Nabucco project Reinhard Mitschek said that the Nabucco consortium was open to Russia’s participation, and was ready to negotiate.

Russia has been working on its own pipeline dubbed South Stream, which targets Italy and Austria, while Nabucco is supposed to run from Turkey to Austria. The two are perceived as rivals, and the Russian leadership has on more than one occasion voiced concerns over the feasibility and viability of Nabucco, as the consortium comprises only transit countries, and not a single producer. This could be the main reason why Russia came into the picture. The Nabucco pipeline was conceived in 2002 and strongly backed by the United States as a means to free Europe from excessive Russian influence, since Russia has been the source of almost half of the gas the EU consumed.
Central Asian countries have been considered the key producers which could provide the 30 billion cubic meters necessary to fill Nabucco and diversify Europe’s energy supplies. Turkmenistan’s and Kazakhstan’s having participated in last week’s summit was seen as a positive signal that both countries were ready to cooperate. [cfr. EU puts energy hopes into Turkmenistan 'black hole'] The Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev stated that his country is prepared to double gas production in order to participate in Nabucco. At the same time, he pointed out the need for transit contracts with EU countries, as well as funding and a clarification of the EU’s energy policy.
The two other possible alternatives are Iran and the U.S.-backed Iraq. The former would hardly provide Europe with more energy security than Russia does, while the latter is still a very distant possibility.
Gas from Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan is already exported to Europe, but it goes via Russia, which imports it and then resells it to consumers.

In any case, Russia and Iran are going to have leverage in the project, since both are members of the Caspian treaty and their approval would be necessary to lay pipelines across the Caspian Sea.

Turkey would be a key transit country for Nabucco, and this could also be a problem. The country, which is aspiring to EU membership, could be tempted to use the pipeline as a bargaining chip to speed up its integration with the union.

Russia could make significant gains from scrapping South Stream and turning to Nabucco instead. The two pipelines have been seen as rivals, and the Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek called South Stream a “direct threat” to Nabucco. The pipelines are going to have the same capacity, and both are scheduled to begin operating in 2013. However, it has been estimated that South Stream could end up costing twice as much as the $8 billion Nabucco. Acting as a major or even the sole gas producer could also help Russia to retain its influence over Europe, marking for a significant gain on the political side.

Source: Russia Profile